Wednesday, August 09, 2006

THE GREAT AND THE GOOD, Part 2

From Solent TV website today:

EX-ARMY CHIEF TO RUN NEW HEALTH BODY

A former High Sheriff and ex-Army Officer is to take charge of the Island’s new joint health organisation.

****** has been appointed as the chair of the Isle of Wight NHS PCT, which comes into being on 1 October 2006. ******, who is a Deputy Lord Lieutenant, had previously been Managing Director of international software and systems house, ****** for 20 years. Prior to that, ****** commanded the largest regiment in the British Army. Currently he devotes his time to voluntary roles in the community. ****** will receive a £32,500 salary for his new role. The new health organisation will bring together the two current bodies – the IW Healthcare NHS Trust and the IW Primary Care Trust.

God help us ! Nothing ever changes here.......

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

HO HUM

Fairly quiet time of the year, which is why I haven't posted for a week. No doubt the calm before the storm, but it has given me time to finish off my next Pan newsletter, which will be delivered to every household from 1st September - mainly by me. That's the way I prefer it. This will be my SIXTH since I was elected in May 2005 - I doubt that will have been beaten.

Put a letter into the County Press for this week, which may make some waves......

Off to try to collect the last few signatures for a Newport Town Council tonight. Aim is to have it finished by the Bank Holiday and ready for Council approval on 20 September

THE GREAT AND THE GOOD, Part 1

Last Thursday evening I went along to something called the 'Chairman's Cowes Week Reception'. Never again !

If the overwhelming majority of those invited and present - mainly the 'great and the good' of the Island and numerous retired or defeated Liberal ex-councillors - was not exclusive and offensive enough, the 'dancing girls' cabaret certainly was. I thought it was a charitable event, it wasn't, and I am now seeking the cost of this event.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

19 HAPPY CHAPPIES !

So the Council staff who were highly motivated and high in morale, and the reason for the lambasting I received at Full Council from the Council Leader(see post of 19.07.06), totalled 19. Yes, NINETEEN.....

Someone must tell the Council Leader how many staff they employ.

SPEAKING BAN LIFTED

I received a letter at the weekend implying that any ban of my asking questions at Cabinet (see 28.7.06) had been lifted ! This is amazing - bans imposed without any form of due process and then appeals upheld without being submitted.....

Friday, July 28, 2006

EGGS ALL IN ONE BASKET

Advised today by the Cabinet member that the Hants & IW Learning & Skills Council (LSC) - which is reponsible for post 16 education - wants to develop a £25m 1200 place 6th form college at the IW College for use from 2009, using government money. Effectively that is our entire requirement here on the Island.

As this would have massive implications for our existing sixth form provision within High Schools, the Council will ensure wide consultation in the autumn term. This will be a fascinating debate in the light of what happened over middle schools last year.......

Additionally the further £25m government grant to rebuild one of our secondary schools, may mean just that - a school for 11-16/18 year olds, not 13 -16/18. This is being clarified as agian that has implications for how Island education is organised.

OH DEAR, OH DEAR......

A packed Scrutiny Committee agenda, successfully completed, ended in very bad feeling last night.

With only two hours to complete the agenda, thanks to the administration's own Council Constitution, my refusal to allow the Leader of the Council - not a committee member of course - to question the Southern Water representative towards the end of the meeting, met with a 'toys out of pram' response of disreputable proportions.

Consequently I have been informed by the Leader that questions from me TO THE CABINET will NOT be allowed for five months. Why 5 months, I have no idea, but when did logic come into it ?

There is no provision in the Constitution for questions from non-Committee members to evidence-givers during a Scrutiny Committee; just as there is no provision at Cabinet for non-Cabinet councillors to ask questions as the agenda progresses. The Leader does allow ad hoc questions from people like me at his meeting when it suits him, but not if the direction of the questioning is embarrassing - see late May Cabinet meeting regarding meetings with Schools Minister.

I did not allow the Leader to ask questions tonight because I am the Chair of the Committee and had an agenda to complete in a short time period. If he can't understand that, and now wants to punish me on a tit for tat basis, so be it. At least I have some idea of how to conduct myself at Council meetings.

Apart from that the meeting was reasonably productive. A number of Planning issues were progressed, thanks to the good sense of Cllr Mosdell - yes, I will name him ! Three Cabinet members made valuable contributions to our enquiries - including broad acceptance of our Wightcare report - and another helped kick off our big Budget enquiry. The Southern Water session was informative and useful, before the pram incident.

One thought. If this Committee is supposed to receive support from the Council's Communications operation, as I am told it is, why does that support go to Cabinet members after the meeting and not to the members of the Scrutiny Committee ????????

I sometimes wish I was really naive........

Thursday, July 27, 2006

TOO BUSY TO POST

The last week has been very busy, leading to less posts than usual.

I spent the weekend on a Chair of Scrutiny training course at Warwick Univ., which mainly consisted of me arguing with LibDem councillors about the role of an opposition Chair. The course was not very good and took a weekend out of my life. I have significant doubts about the agency that organises all the councillor training.

I have also been involved in the appointment of the new Director of Adult & Community Services, which was concluded last evening. Interesting that one of the candidates spent time reading this blog ! As they say, it is sometimes the only way to find out what is going on.........

Tonight is the Scrutiny Committee, for which I have to do a massive amount of preparation as the agenda is packed with public interest issues........

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

ANOTHER WORLD ?

This post lifts its head up from parochial matters and contemplates the political party I have been a member of for over 20 years.

The Labour Leader will stand down sometime next year and we will then elect a new Leader by the autumn of 2007. Everyone presumes it will be a Gordon Brown coronation, but in my view that would be entirely wrong.

What must be done is for the party to have a debate about the direction it wants to go after Blair. That is why I am supporting a leadership campaign by John McDonnell MP for when the Prime Minister resigns - see After Blair Link on left.

I do this not because I think he will win, but because I want the party to have a debate - do we want more Blair/Brownism, or do we want to refocus our policies on the hopes of ordinary working people ? Or do we want something that steers a course between the two ?

With David Cameron re-energising his party by blatant opportunism (though no doubt causing heart attacks in the blue rinse brigade) maybe it is time for Labour to spell out some significant differences between us and the Tories ?

John McDonnell wants a leadership debate that is about choices for the party:
  • between promoting public services or continued privatisation;
  • between free education or trust schools and tuition fees;
  • between increasing the state pension and restoring the link with earnings or forcing more people onto the means test;
  • between allowing councils to build council houses once again or high rents, escalating housing costs, homelessness and overcrowding;
  • between energy from green power sources, conservation, and British clean coal or the costs and risks of nuclear power;
  • between promoting civil liberties and trade union rights or reactionary incursions into the right of free speech, assembly and trial;
  • between a government committed to peace, withdrawal from Iraq and nuclear disarmament or backing Bush's wars and wasting £24 billion on Trident.
I think that is a debate that Labour must have post-Blair and I am delighted that John McDonnell has put his name forward to ensure that debate.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

FULL COUNCIL HELL !

Full Council tonight, which was a form of hell. Two Powerpoint presentations meant curtains had to be closed in the Council Chamber - on one of the hottest evenings of the year. And I was the only male councillor without a tie ! What are they all trying to prove ? I am not being 'disrespectful' by not having a tie on in weather like this....surely ?

Meeting was pretty uneventful. Some argy-bargy over the repeal of the taxi zoning system, which I supported in the interests of customer choice, with the other opposition groups opposing or abstaining. Congratulations to the IW Island Games Assoc. from all, and then a Public Health Report. The latter was then followed by a motion that the Council do all it can to reduce levels of obesity and to encourage healthy eating. I managed to work in a question about muesli and the Council's staff, which drew laughter with its reference to the Leader's most recent attempt at winning friends and influence.

There was a pretty discreditable question to me after my Scrutiny Chair's Report relating to the Labour Group leadership, which I dealt with appropriately. I also thanked the Chair for placing my Report in the Cabinet section of the agenda, and suggested that this was, however, nearly 3 years ahead of the schedule for Labour members to be running the Cabinet !

This was followed by the Leader's Report, where he dealt with a question about current staff morale from an Independent by lambasting Deborah and I for previously talking about low morale, on the basis of some report none of us in opposition have ever seen. After that there were the other Cabinet member reports - with quite a number of placed, soft questions from ruling group backbenchers. I asked a number of questions, but you start to get sick of hearing your own voice.

Finally I have recommenced from today my previous practice of not attending the start of Full Council until after 'Prayers'. I had given up this practice in the last 3 months, but have decided that I will always stay out for the rest of my term. I do not think such an overtly religious and Christian start to Council meetings is either appropriate or very inclusive. In my view religious celebration should be a personal, not a public matter.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

SCRUTINY COMMITTEE MOVES UP A GEAR

PRESS RELEASE

After a quiet meeting last month, the IW Council's Scrutiny Committee on Thursday 27 July (6pm, County Hall) will demonstrate it is moving up a gear in terms of holding the Council and most public service providers to account on behalf of the Island people.

The packed agenda for the meeting includes;
  • an enquiry into the reason for Southern Water's hosepipe ban, with the water company sending along a senior manager to respond to questions;
  • separate, evidence-giving appearances by four of the seven Council Cabinet members - Cllrs Ward, Wood, Cousins and Abrahams - as the Committee progresses two of its current formal enquiries ('planning gains' and 'the delivery and impact of budget efficiencies'), tries to get to the bottom of precisely why a substantial Government housing grant was lost this year, and exactly who is responsible for enforcing on-street parking infringements at present;
  • an expected response from the Cabinet member to the Committee's recent Wightcare privatisation enquiry report;
  • the conclusion of two earlier enquiries into Development Control processes and reporting.
Cllr Geoff Lumley, Chair of the Scrutiny Committee said, "After the excellent Scrutiny Committee meetings of April and May where we concentrated on the Wightcare enquiry, last month's meeting was relatively quiet. However, the meeting this month has a packed agenda of public interest items, showing that the Scrutiny Committee takes its role very seriously indeed and is pursuing an extensive work programme. We have had better attendances from members of the public than the Cabinet over the first three months I have been the Chair, and I hope that will continue to be the case this month. In the autumn we will be looking at ways and means of improving public engagement with the scrutiny process."

Cllr Lumley concluded, "Scrutiny of local affairs - whether its the Council or other public bodies - is something the Government is very keen on developing. We are likely to see the extension of scrutiny powers in the local government White Paper in the autumn to agencies like the police. If Islanders are not sure what scrutiny is all about, why not come along to one of our meetings to get a flavour of what we are up to ?"

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

'AIM HIGH' ON WAY OUT ?

Apart from the 'Aim High' dog-leashes all Tory councillors have to wear, you never hear come across this twaddle phrase anywhere these days. Particularly since the new Chief Executive started.......

COUNCIL TORIES - 'NOT A HAPPY SHIP'

This was reported to me by a reliable source recently and confirms everything I have been hearing over the last few weeks. Apparently the Tories' last group meeting was a bit of a battle, with the MP rushed down from Westminster on a Thursday to help mediate.

The Council Leader's propensity for 'favourites' does not go down well in such a large group, especially if you are not one of them !

AUDIT COMMISSION BLAME MANAGERS FOR NHS DEFICITS

As I have been saying it for most of the last year on the Council's Health Scrutiny Commission, I make no apologies for drawing attention to: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/5165242.stm

Pity that I have been slammed down for suggesting as much

Friday, July 07, 2006

BACK FROM BOURNEMOUTH

Back from the LGA Conference, which was very useful for a new councillor like me. Attended lots of workshops that will hopefully help me make a stronger and better informed contribution as an opposition, but constructive, councillor.

Main drawback was being stupid enough to endure a dull speech by 'Dave' Cameron - Dave the Chameleon indeed ! Of the two Labour Cabinet Ministers who appeared - Ruth Kelly and David Miliband - the latter was as ever frighteningly bright and capable.......

Lots of ward stuff to get on with this weekend; not least of which are the summer public drinking problems at Downside Playing Field. Time for this Tory Council to act, instead of spouting hot air.

Sunday, July 02, 2006

NEW CHIEF EXEC ON PAN WALKABOUT

Spent an hour on Friday evening showing the new Chief Executive around Pan ward, though was mainly on the estate. He was very keen to see what all the focus on Pan is about and left I hope with a better understanding of why there is that focus, even though compared to most mainland urban areas the estate is quite delightful. I told him that the putting down of Pan locally is just historic and ignorant snobbery about social housing.

Tomorrow I am off to the Local Government Association conference in Bournemouth for the week, together with the Council Leader and another Cabinet member. Never before will I have spent so much time with so many Conservatives; fortunately the LGA does have a Labour Group !

Thursday, June 29, 2006

SCRUTINY CONFERENCE

Spent yesterday in London at a conference for Scrutiny councillors and officers. Organised by the Centre for Public Scrutiny, it was not very good at all. Dominated by councillors from Tory authorities who have no idea what scrutiny is about, in my view. At least this Tory Council had the guts to allow an opposition chair of its Scrutiny Committee - yes, that's almost a compliment !

Friday, June 23, 2006

WIGHTCARE REPORT ENDORSED

After some fuss whilst I was away over the publication of the draft Wightcare report before it was formally approved - to comply with the end of May deadline we were given - last night the Scrutiny Committee did approve it with 6 votes in favour, 1 against and 1 abstention.

The rest of the meeting was pretty short as my planned agenda had been somewhat curtailed whilst I was away. A pity really as the MP turned up to listen, only for me to close the meeting 5 minutes after his arrival ! Next month will be back to normal.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

......THE MICE DO PLAY

Full Council last night and the four LibDems were suddenly all bright and bushy-tailed ! Is it because the Council Leader wasn't there to give them their deserved monthly reprimand for a decade plus of political incompetence, or has at last establishing a proper Group under Henry Adams' benign leadership re-enthused them ? Time will tell.

Excellent question from the public gallery about the new £40k communications improvement contract with Westminster City Council, after they spent £14k on another communications consultant earlier this year and improved not one dot. Of course the gentleman did not get an answer, but later on I got an assurance that this is a fixed term contract and that communications will not be handled permanently by Westminster staff. Personally I take a view that the Council's communications are deperately poor and have ignored them since I became Scrutiny Chair and they failed with my early request for a media release.

This Council was the first with the new LibDem Chairman - may be that's another reason why his colleagues were so bullish - and the new Chief Executive. Suddenly all Directors are now in attendance for the first time in years......

A motion urging the government to do all it could to ensure the Royal Mail keeps existing sub-Post Offices was approved unanimously.

A change in the format of the Best Value Performance Plan was approved, with opposition councillors abstaning and one Cabinet Member mysteriously joining them. Just wait till the Leader gets up from his sick bed !

I asked a question about a scheduled high-level meeting to discuss the loss of Government funding for failing to tackle anti-social behavious, but was assured this was an error in the title of the meeting !

I also asked, on Deborah's behalf, a question about the claimed sudden loss of government housing grant (reported at Cabinet on May 23) and the contrary information we had received from Govt Office of South East. Lots of bluster - seemingly the main tactic now when we catch them out on dealings with government - but we will pursue this. Perhaps they will learn not to blame the government for things unless they have all their facts right ?

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

WHILST THE CAT'S AWAY.......

Went into County Hall today for the first time during daytime in nearly a month. All very quiet. Didn't spot a Tory anywhere. Could this be something to do with the Leader slipping his disc ?

Saturday, June 17, 2006

RETURN TO THE FRONTLINE !


Well my 2 week holiday passed well and I have also returned from a Conference 'up north' last week feeling well-relaxed - until I saw the front page of the County Press at Portsmouth yesterday......'£300,000 pay rise for top Council officers'. Got my blood pressure right up.

It seems that the Cabinet meeting I missed this week has agreed a new top management structure to ensure the new semi-detached, £150,000 per annum Chief Executive is well-supported. You couldn't make it up ! Adverts have already been placed for new top managers and this Tory Council continues on its merry way of taking the p**s out of low-paid Islanders, and without anyone at Cabinet to at least try to challenge them.

Ironically, whilst I was away our Scrutiny report on Wightcare seems to have ruffled quite a number of Tory feathers - and all it does is try to ensure the transfer of low-paid, mainly female home carers to the private sector is deferred whilst a proper review is undertaken into this in-house service. At a part year cost of not much more than £300k !

Friday, May 26, 2006

BLOG BREAK

I' m taking a little break from blogging for the next 3 weeks ! Don't miss me too much....

FIRST SCRUTINY REPORT - WIGHTCARE

The first enquiry of the Scrutiny Committee since May 2005 - into Wightcare - has concluded and is now in the public domain. I have commented,

"This enquiry is about a matter of significant public interest and the three of us who lead this enquiry have come to the conclusion that any transfer of Wightcare homecare should be deferred for the next year to allow a full business Review and service-user consultation to take place. We have consequently recommended that the Council leadership re-prioritise their expenditure in Adult Services to achieve this deferral, which we consider achievable if there is the political will to accept our report.
The Report has been submitted to Cllr Cousins, Cabinet Member for Care, Health & Housing, and I hope she and the rest of the Cabinet will welcome it and take on board the recommendations as soon as possible."

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

GHOSTS OF LIBERAL PAST !

Full Council tonight and it was like one of those fifties zombie movies ! The public gallery was stuffed with failed and largely unlamented ex-Liberal councillors - all there to see the appointment (by the Tories, as no one else was consulted) of one of their own as the new Chairman of the Council. It was a real 'rogue's gallery' - reinforcing why they had their electoral debacle last year. Still at least the rump of them left recently got their act together at last and formed a proper group; with good old Henry as leader...

Most of the meeting was pretty tedious, though there was a Cabinet re-shuffle of sorts announced by the Council leader - with the care and child protection elements of Children's Services moved from Patrick Joyce to Dawn Cousins (contradicting the government's Every Child Matters philosophy), and a thunderous looking Tim Hunter-Henderson dumped with much of Jilly Wood's previous portfolio on top of all the rest he holds, so that she can mess around with parish councils.

I was re-appointed as Chair of Scrutiny for another year and consequently went home at the end to work on finishing off our Wightcare scrutiny enquiry report, whilst the 'zombies' joined most councillors at a 'reception'.

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

MIDDLE SCHOOLS STILL UNDER REVIEW ?

Very interesting exchange at Cabinet tonight between my colleague Cllr Gardiner and the Council leadership over the Tory's commitment to retaining middle schools. The Council leader had recently given an absolute commitment to their retention after making it a (successful) election issue last year.

Deborah asked for that commitment again, got it from the leader, and then pointed out that this contradicted what they had told the Schools Minister, when summoned to Westminster on 15 Feb this year to explain what they were doing to address educational under-performance. The notes of that ministerial meeting, which she had obtained from the DfES, reported that the Council leaders had said "they were exploring a gradual move to 0-7, 7-11 and 11-16 provision" (which of course is not what we have now) "which could provide efficiencies as well as supporting standards".

This caused quite some consternation at the Cabinet table and lots of bluster about ensuring parents were consulted about any future changes, if there were to be any. Which of course is what everyone would want!

The beauties of Freedom of Information - brought in by a Labour government......

MORE TO LIFE THAN MONEY ?

After the announcement by the Tory national leader that "there are more things to life than money" I wonder if this welcome philosophy will now permeate to our local Tory Council - who know the price of everything, but little of the value ? A real pity that "we get this Gradgrindian lot just at a time when the national Tories go all caring and fluffy on us", as my Labour colleague Deborah Gardiner remarked !

Saturday, May 20, 2006

BUDGET SHORTFALL

Further to my previous postings on the required efficiences for this year's Budget (May 9th).

Seems that there is still a fair amount to find after all, despite the claim of it all being 'sorted'. Somewhere in the region of £2.5 million at least.

And they still claim there won't be cuts in frontline services ?????

TORIES FOIST ONE OF THEIRS ON ME AS SCRUTINY VICE CHAIR

Seemingly because of critical comments about their budget on this blog and in Labour campaign literature, and perhaps because the CPA inspectors have now disappeared for a while, I have now had the Tories on the Scrutiny Committee foisting one of their own unelected co-optees on to me as Vice Chair.

Despite assurances when the CPA inspectors were here that the opposition members on the committee would be able to elect their own Vice Chair - someone to help me with the Chair's job - last Thursday the Tory members outvoted the opposition choice in favour of their own co-optee. So much for 'opposition control', but I will make sure this this change in approach is made known.

Perhaps they will now get rid of me as Chair at next week's Annual Council ? That would be their best step if they are feeling so defensive, because I can assure them that they haven't seen any real criticism yet !

Thursday, May 18, 2006

'SUPERCOUNCILLOR SUTTON' APPEARS AT SCRUTINY

This afternoon saw the Scrutiny Committee. Went reasonably well with some tough questioning of the Care, Health & Housing Cabinet Member on the proposed Wightcare privatisation. However, there was 'Supercouncillor Sutton' along to ride shotgun and to help out when there were difficulties. I hope this isn't a sign of the future. We either have a Cabinet or its a case of the 'Man with Seven Portfolios' and we just ask him along for all enquiries ! Now to put our Report together.....

Interestingly there were a dozen or so members of the public present - some from Wightcare - and the County Press, but not a single councillor other than those on the Committee or called before it. Must be a good dinner tonight !!!

Monday, May 15, 2006

KEEPING ON KEEPING ON....

I'm aware that my blog has been a little unexciting lately, but there has been little to say that is particularly noteworthy and something I can report...

Last week saw the CPA inspection conclude, with the report due out in August. The inspectors have probably fallen for all the flannel, such is the return anyone would expect from all the resources thrown at the inspection over the last few months.

This week sees my second Scrutiny Committee as Chair - equaling the record for a Chair of this committee, but in only 2 months - not the 5 months my predecessor had ! We have Cllr Cousins coming along to answer questions on the proposed Wightcare privatisation, which will be an interesting session. I then have to draw the enquiry to a conclusion by 26 May. We also have the Council Leader along to tell us what happened to the 'strategic partnering' business case.

The meeting is at 4pm - yes 4pm, irony of ironies - as someone saw fit to organise an 'end of term' dinner for the Council Chairman that evening without checking the Council calendar. Talk about 'silo' working ! It wouldn't have affected me, but some of the committee wanted to show their regard for the Chairman. So we got an 'exceptional circumstances' time change. Of course this will mean there are less ordinary people there to observe the meeting.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

A RECENT COMMENT

The comment placed on my last post just needs to have attention drawn to it - so here it is:

Have it on the highest authority that they’re going to sell County Hall and Seaclose, redevelop Sea Street, and meet in a marquee on one of Barry Abrahams’ fields; Housing services will be privatized, and run by Hoogstraten Services Inc (“Quality Services – Only British Thugs Employed”); Schools will be run by the Elim Pentecostal Church, from their shed at Coppins Bridge, in return for minor influence on the curriculum – it won’t matter, because God loves YOU!; and roads will just be allowed to crumble, thus saving on bus subsidies, ending coach travel, and, incidentally, stopping the working classes from moving about.

I think you’ll find this is all perfectly sensible when you come to think about it, and the model for local councils throughout the country. It will be marvellous for tourism, because people won’t need to go abroad anymore to see what a third world economy is really like; and our young people will be able to take advantage of the enormous opportunities opened up for prostitution and drug trafficking by the arrival of the international jet-set as they pour into Sutton International Airport at Sandown.

In preparation for this, I am investing in a smock and begging bowl: it is my duty to play my part in Isle of Wight regeneration by really throwing myself into the role of Village Idiot plc, and I hope our others are not going to be backward in coming forward in these days of exciting opportunity by any kind of curmudgeonly reluctance to seize the new future.

Aim high! Such is our creed (I have tried this, but there is a problem with splash-back......)

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

EFFICIENCIES ? WHAT EFFICIENCIES ?


My world is sometimes surreal ! Last week I was told by a leading Cabinet member that Deborah and I had the wrong end of the stick in claiming the Council has to make £6m worth of budget efficiencies this financial year. I was told not to worry (my little head ?), they had already been made as part of the 'sorting out' of the inherited previous year's budget.

Well I went away- not feeling re-assured, more puzzled. I dug out the Budget resolution agreed last February by this Council and noted that yes, this budget is predicated on £6m of efficiencies being in place - though where they were is another question.

However, the same resolution also had a Council Tax projection for the next 3 years. This shows that far from anyone being re-assured, the efficiencies required for this year amount to £4.3m, for next year £9.6m, and for March 2009 - just before the next elections - £13.7m. A massive total of £27.6 MILLION !

And I am supposed to be re-assured ???????????????

Thursday, May 04, 2006

PAN BUS MEETING GOES WELL

My public meeting last night went pretty well, though nothing has really changed. About 80 local people turned up, the vast majority of whom - but not all - are unhappy at the new double-decker service.

Marc Morgan Huws of Southern Vectis bravely accepted my invitation. He explained why SV want to use the Furrlongs route, and an officer of the Public Transport section of the Council then explained that buses (under existing legisaltion) can basically go where they like if the service is not a subsidised one - as this one isn't. There were then loads of questions, comments and criticisms and Marc was left in no doubt as to majority local opinion - as reflected in my quick, 400-signature petition last month.

Pleas to change the service to single-decker were made by most present and maybe SV will listen to them next September when the next timetable comes out.

I wrapped up the meeting by urging SV to change to a single-decker service and pledged to continue lobbying SV about this in the months to come.

Feedback from attendees has been very positive today as they were pleased to get the opprtunity to voice their concerns personally.

INSPECTORS QUIZ ME ON MORALE

Met with one of the CPA inspectors yesterday. Wanted to know all about the Scrutiny debacle pre-April and what my priorities for the Island are - real, well paid jobs; real affordable housing; real educational improvement; and real sustainable and intregrated transport options. I used the word REAL a lot! He seemed approving of my post-April Scrutiny agenda, and I pointed out the administration could have had that from last November.

Was also very interested - entirely unprompted by me - in staff morale issues. Gave him my perspective. This seems to be a quite a theme....

Told him this was the most overtly political administration at County Hall in a generation.

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

AN INSPECTOR CALLS

Tomorrow I will be meeting with the the Council's Comprehensive Performance Assessment assessors. Should be interesting....

PAN BUS MEETING

Wednesday sees my public meeting on Pan about the unpopular new bus service through the estate. The meeting takes place at Downside Middle School at 7pm, and I have Marc Morgan Huws along from Southern Vectis to answer questions and hear concerns, as well as a Highways officer.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

SCRUTINEERING


The Wightcare privatisation scrutiny enquiry continues apace. Myself and my two enquiry colleagues continue to have meetings with identified stakeholders. This is interesting stuff and I am looking forward to pulling it all together into a final report in late May.

Obviously I won't say much about these enquiries on this blog, as it is unfair to the participants; suffice to say I am not going to pass up this opportunity to make scrutiny meaningful.

CONFIRMED - NO BUSINESS CASE

The Summary version of PA Consulting's report on support services privatisation is out this afternoon. 14 pages of wriggling on a the hook that the Tories created for themselves in their manifesto: a 3000 word, 10 page document that they must be beginning to deeply regret.

Essentially PA recommend that support services should not be transferred to a private company, but that a private company will be brought in to help the Council secure increased efficiencies in its support services. This model is called with that wonderful use of plain English that surrounds consultancies - a Strategic Transformation Partnership. Sounds like something out of Dr Who - on the baddies side !

In plain English - an outside consultant ! A bit like the education partnership with Mouchell Parkman. Wonder how that is going ?

Monday, April 24, 2006

BUSINESS CASE DELAY BECAUSE......

..........there was no business case, as many have long suggested ? If that were the case it would be another (welcome) reneging on one of the Tories' manifesto commitments. So it probably had to go back to PA with instructions to get them off that particular hook.

No doubt opposition councillors might find out what is happening sometime this week. Rumours abound, but I feel like the proverbial mushroom !

Sunday, April 23, 2006

CASE FOR PRIVATISATION

The PA Consulting 'business case' for strategic partnering is expected out this week. Was due at end of March. What was the delay ?

Friday, April 21, 2006

SCRUTINY STIRS INTEREST ! SHOCK STORY...

I know its beating my own drum, but it was generally acknowledged that the first Scrutiny Committee with me as Chair last night was the real McCoy - for the first time since last July. A powerful example of non-executive councillors, and lay people, beginning the process of holding the Cabinet to account over a decision of high public interest - the proposed privatisation of Wightcare.

We had three very courageous Home Care Organisers presenting a case for retaining Wightcare as a Council service, albeit with less restrictions on what services it can offer; with a media presence, as many members of the public as you see at Full Council and more than at Cabinet, and about a dozen Tory councillors observing.

The one in May will have its first Cabinet member appearing and will be an even better example of what public scrutiny is about, with an element of political theatre.

I felt proud that a Labour councillor is facilitating this - though I know what follows pride !!!! And the rest of the committee, of all parties and none, fully played their part

CAREERIST POLITICIANS

At Full Council this week we had Cllr Ian Stephens - currently an 'independent' - applauding himself for being non-political - when he was a leading LibDem until last May before jumping that particular sinking ship to save his electoral skin.

We have also learnt that LibDem Cllr Charles Chapman will be nominated by the Tories as the next Council Chairman from next month; no doubt to be followed by him making a political journey himself, to demonstrate his gratitude.

At this rate there will be no LibDem councillors at all. One thing is certain - Labour councillors at County Hall know what principle is.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

HELLO TORY BACKBENCHERS !

I have been told that my blog is the best source of Council information for the 50% of the Tory Group who have no special responsibility ! Indeed there are repeated rumours of a Tory 'Backbench Committee' !

Of course tomorrow afternoon sees the annual meeting of the Tory Group where they decide who will be nominated as Council Leader etc at May's Full Council. Strikes me that this is an opportunity for the 'dispossessed, unemployed and unvalued' to exert their latent power.

Of course they could just join the Labour party instead as it is clear there are a good number who aren't really Tories....you know who you are !

Friday, April 14, 2006

NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Councillors learnt last night who the new Chief Executive will be - some chap from Westminster City Council, a Council which is busy outsourcing their staff to the north of Scotland.

The appointment was made by a panel of seven - five Tories, one Independent and my Labour colleague Cllr Gardiner. Haven't had the chance to speak to her about it yet.

However, it is interesting how this appointment will be recommended to Full Council next week with so little involvement of all the Councillors. Good practice would have ensured that the other 41 councillors would have had the opportunity to meet the candidates informally and feedback their impressions to the panel, but this did not happen. At least it didn't happen to a significant number, including at least one Cabinet member and myself - who does have an allegedly important role in this Council as Scrutiny Chair.

FESTIVAL GETS LICENCE

The Festival licence was granted last night, including the new limit of 59,999. I spoke in favour of a limit of 40,000 - as last year - but predictably it fell on deaf ears, though local people have thanked me for doing so. When Conservatives - who constituted the entire Licensing Committee - have to balance the interests of business and local people there is no contest. All a waste of time really, particularly when my own local councillor was banned from speaking. I would have told them to get lost if that had affected Pan.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

WHO 'BANISHED' THE LIBDEMS?

Cabinet tonight. Only agenda item was progressing the Decriminalisation of Car Parking for April 2007, which I support as it may help with my other plans to have Newport's residential streets turned into a short-stay parking zone for non-residents. More on that in a fortnight.

Had some fun! Welcomed the Leader's comments in a magazine article that he would be happy to see the LibDem party banished on the Island, but asked him if he agreed that the Island electorate had effectively done that last May, with the plummeting of their vote and the continuing rise in the Labour vote. Of course he agreed. And gave us his usual anti-LibDem tirade - no principles, no leadership, no responsibility, etc etc. Helped introduce some humour to the proceedings. And of course, it is all true !

Monday, April 10, 2006

TEA WARS

Good to see that the issue of free tea and coffee in the Councillors' kitchen at County Hall is fully exercising some Councillors. Talk about fiddling whilst Rome burns !

SECRET MEETING WITH SOLO

Very interesting that the Cabinet is meeting privately with the Festival promoter next Tuesday - just after the Licensing Committee........

Saturday, April 08, 2006

55,000 IS TOO MANY

Next Thursday I will urge the Council's Licensing Committee to limit the numbers allowed for the IW Rock Festival to 35,000. That was the figure last year and is more than enough for the Seaclose Park location. I support the festival entirely, having been there in two of the last three years (paying for my own ticket), but feel strongly that there has to be a limit for this residential area - on both numbers and licensing hours. Its not in my ward, though I do live there, but I have had concerns expressed from people in Pan adjacent to the Fairlee area.

The promoters have cleverly and cynically tried to back the Licensing Committee into a corner. They have sold 55,000 tickets without having the licence for such numbers, and will no doubt threaten to pull out if they don't get their way. This week's County Press has given us a compliant public relations push by the promoter, delivering the image of a major philanthropist and benefactor for the Island. Bottom line for all promoters of festivals - they want to make as much money as possible......

TOWARDS A TOWN COUNCIL

The petition for a Newport Town Council is progressing well, with 60% of the required signatures secured. Last night saw the establishment of the transitional body - the Newport Town Management Committee - that will eventually lead to a Town Council. All the IW Councillors are on it, plus up to 7 co-opted people - appointed through due process. Sadly no one from Pan applied to be co-opted, though there is still a vacancy. Must see what I can do.

Astonishingly at this inaugural meeting I somehow got elected as the Chair for the next year. Not sure how this happened when there are six Tory Councillors or members out of the 12 current members, but I won an election 6 votes to 5 ! Obviously this leads to even more responsibility for an already hard-working councillor, but as ever I will give it my best.

Thursday, April 06, 2006

TORY PUPIL EXCLUSION CENTRE BITES DUST

Another Tory manifesto commitment - to SET UP an Exclusion Centre for unruly school students - has bitten the dust. However, I have to say I am delighted. Such centres will never solve behaviour problems; only proper support from County Hall, parents, staff and governors will. An example of populist promises not being based on realities.

Apart from that I have spent much of the week so far getting the Scrutiny enquiry into the Wightcare privatisation moving, and dealing with irate residents of Furrlongs about the buses through Pan estate. I have decided to go ahead with a public meeting about the latter on 3rd May at Downside Middle School (7pm) at which there will be representatives of Southern Vectis and Highways to answer questions and respond to mounting concerns.

Friday, March 31, 2006

PROFIT BEFORE PEOPLE

Predictably Southern Vectis will go ahead with their Pan bus plans from Sunday, despite a 400 signature petition - of which 115 came from the 125 houses on the Furrlongs route - and my personal pleas this afternoon.

As these are commercial services they can more or less do what they like under the bus-deregulation introduced by the Tory Government over a decade ago. About time the current government looked at this, in my view ........

The new route 8 is initially for a 5 month trial. If it isn't as successful as they think it will be, it may be withdrawn. Perhaps a boycott would help !

They will attend a public meeting with me in early May, if Pan judges the service to be intolerbale in practice. The community needs to be ready to make complaints to them from Sunday. This is not over yet.

Thursday, March 30, 2006

COUNCIL WATCHDOG MOVES UP A GEAR ?

Had an informal meeting of the Scrutiny Committee today - ahead of my becoming Chair on April Fools Day !!!!

I was asked to chair the meeting and overall I think my agenda went down pretty well. I outlined my vision of a proactive and energetic committee, holding the Cabinet to account on issues that matter to Islanders - of which I detailed nine for the next year.

In that vein we agreed that our first new enquiry will be into the current financial circumstances and the proposed privatisation of Wightcare - the home care service. We set up a panel to do this over the next few weeks, lead by myself with Cllrs Gardiner and Mosdell also involved. The Cabinet member had previously agreed to assist and to defer any final decision.

Future public meetings of the Committee will be opened up to public questions about issues on the agenda. I will also be seeking an 'accountability slot' at Full Council.

Much to do in this new role.......

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

BUS PETITION PROGRESS

The Pan bus petition closed last night with almost 400 signatures in just 4 days (25% of Pan estate residents), of which 115 came from the 125 homes on Furrlongs. Pretty conclusive opposition then....

I will be submitting it to Southern Vectis on Friday and am making provisional arrangments for a public meeting with Southern Vectis so that local concerns can be voiced in a more impolite manner than I adopt. I have little doubt though that the first bus will turn into Furrlongs at 9am on Sunday morning, but we will keep the pressure on.

Its a pity that in all of this I have felt one particular Council service has been acting more as an agent of the bus company than as a service for the community. I will take that feeling further when I have a moment.......Not really what I expect of a Council claiming to listen to Islanders. Must remember to tell others with more clout than me that !

COUNCIL STRIKE

I visited the County Hall picket lines yesterday morning at 7.15am to demonstrate my support for the industrial action. I then went to the Rally later that morning and was delighted to find around 400 union members there. All in all the action seemed to be pretty solid across the Island and shows that solidarity is the only way to beat intransigence and unreasonableness. And there may need to be plenty of that solidarity in the coming months.

Most ridiculous comment of the year so far from the double-barrelled Tory baronet that leads the intransigent Local Government Association, "The vast majority of Council services across England have not been affected by this strike action." Yeah - and pigs DO fly Mr Bruce-Lockhart.

Sunday, March 26, 2006

PAN BUS THREAT PETITION STARTS WITH A BANG

My petition against 50+ double-decker buses running daily through Pan estate from next Sunday got off with a bang on Saturday morning.

A party colleague and I collected over 150 signatures from local people in 2 hours outside Pan Stores, and at one point were visited by the Island's MP.

The response from my constituents was terrific on a damp, chilly morning, with only three people not wanting to sign-up. The petition is now available in Pan Stores until Tuesday evening and I hope to get at least 500 signatures by then.

Once I have that I can go to Southern Vectis and the Council leadership later next week with evidence that the Pan community does not want this many double-decker buses running through their residential estate. Hopefully they will both then see sense and keep this bus route on Staplers Road where it belongs.

Friday, March 24, 2006

SOME TIME AT LAST !

Been away from my blog the last few days, attending more meetings than is healthy, both as a councillor and at work !

Wednesday was my Care, Health & Housing Policy Commission, which was mildly interesting on public health issues and then some interminable presentation by some local health manager who wants the Commission to be nice to them......

Last night was the last Scrutiny Committee before I get my hands on it ! This one was quite good at times, with some interesting questioning of the Chair & Vice Chair of the Development Control Committee about planning application processes, before that was shut down - possibly for daring to ask challenging questions. No press in attendance again for the third meeting in succession. Desperately needs a shake up - which it will get in April.

Today - after first noting I had a fair bit of coverage in the County Press - spent the morning in County Hall at informal meetings on things like Council assets and scrutiny. This afternoon spent my time with a Cabinet member, the PNP managers and various bigwig Council officers - the Pan Development Steering Group - firstly touring Pan estate and the development site, followed by a progress meeting in the Isobel Centre. Made my usual pleas for a by-pass and better communication with local residents.

I will be outside Pan Stores tomorrow collecting petition signatures against Southern Vectis and the Council's plans to route up to 52 double-decker buses per day up and down Furrlongs from April 2nd. Of course I was not consulted or even told about this by the Council, probably because they know people don't want it. Ce'st las vie - when you are the councillor for Pan. Will they never learn ? ..............The well-oiled campaign machine wheels into action.....

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

CABINET REPORT - PAN ON THE AGENDA

As usual went to the Cabinet tonight, and as usual no other opposition group had a member in attendance, though - as usual - there were about eight non-Cabinet Tories there, and - as usual - only one member of the public.

Main issues for me were:

1. Applications for the new 50p bus fares concession from 19s and under who are in education, but not in mainstream, 'full time education' will be looked at favourably by the Council. I know people who this will benefit. I applauded the older and disabled people scheme for free travel and reminded the Cabinet that the core funding was nearly £1m from the Labour government;

2. A policy paper on the Pan development was agreed. The Council will seek to appoint a private-sector Joint Venture Partner where it will share the capital return over 10 years, but not bear the (necessary) infrastructure risks. It will seek to provide 240 (30%) affordable houses, working with all the Island Housing Associations, lead by Medina HA. Finally all houses should be built to the best energy-efficient standard. I got a commitment from the Transport member to examine closely the option of providing a Pan by-pass, which would reduce the number of houses on the development from 800 to just under 700. I also got a commitment from the Housing member for 'flexibility', in reponse to my plea for a 40% level of afforable housing.

The Cabinet also dealt with - seconding OTs to the Hospital Trust for joint working with their OTs; the parking order for 2006; and the setting up of an Island Investment Company with the South East Economic Development Agency to facilitate regeneration.

Saturday, March 18, 2006

M.P. SUPPORTS MY CALL FOR PAN BY-PASS

Our local MP has today joined my repeated calls since September for a Pan by-pass when the new housing development starts. Such a by-pass would run from upper Staplers Raod to Shide, around the edge of the new development.

I have been calling for this relief road on the Pan Development Steering Group for some months since my election, but until recently it has fallen on deaf ears. The previous LibDem Council also ignored those calls from my predecessor Tony Coburn and local residents of Pan.

However, the Council's Transport Cabinet member also indicated his support to me this week and with the MP's support this should now be deliverable. I know Pan residents certainly hope so....

Friday, March 17, 2006

COUNCIL WORKERS PENSION STRIKE

Unison members working for the Council will be joining one million local government workers nationwide in a strike on 28 March in defence of their existing pension scheme.

I make no bones about it - they have the total support of the Labour councillors, and I have told government as much. In my view it is disgraceful to change the pension conditions of staff mid-emplyment, especially when so many are low-paid. The average pension in the scheme is around £3k per annum. Not exactly a fat cat pension. And lower wages than the private sector in return for a reasonable retirement age on a final salary pension has always been the accepted balance.

The government settled with teachers, health workers and civil servants last year over the same issue, protecting the pension conditions of existing staff. Local government staff are just as much vital public servants as they are, especially teaching assistants who work alongside teachers, and adult services staff working with civil service Pensions staff.

This dispute has been pushed onto the government by the Tory grandees that run the Local Government Association, which does not want a settlement, to protect existing pensioner Council tax payers at the expense of future pensioners.

I will join the County Hall picket lines on 28 March for part of the day and urge others to do so too.

INDEPENDENTS SEE SENSE

I was pleased to hear from Cllr Heather Humby today, who has agreed to join the Scrutiny Committee for the Independent group. Just leaves a LibDem to get on board now and we can really get this ship out of harbour

Thursday, March 16, 2006

A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY

I went along to something called the Tom Woolgar Trust tonight, which I was persuaded to join a few weeks ago. No one seems to remember who Mr Woolgar was, but when he died in 1928 he left a Trust fund to provide heating costs relief for the 'poor and needy' older population of Newport Borough. A sort of do it yourself Winter Fuel Payment. Ever since then four Newport Borough, then Medina Borough, and now IWC councillors meet every first quarter of the year to dispense grants to applicants from the fund. So I was following a long line of illustrious Newport Labour councillors - John McKeown, Jack Powell, Jack Kinchington, Bert Chalmers - whose names I noted in the Minute Book for the 1960s and 1970s.

There does not seem to be as many applicants these days, probably because of the Labour Government's excellent Winter Fuel payments, but of the 19 applicants 16 were from Pan. The Trust members were pleased to award £75 to each of them and we all left feeling we had done our historical duty. And my name will now be in that Minute Book !

ONLY LABOUR TO ENGAGE IN SCRUTINY

Although I missed my first Full Council last night - due to a longstanding personal commitment - I was elected as the new Chair of the Scutiny Committee from 1st April (should I worry about that date?). Although there seems to have been some sort of opposition boycott of the meeting, with only 5 in attendance (including Deborah) out of 12, my nomination as Chair only attracted votes against from the LibDems present. No surprise there then.

An attempt to resurrect (at my prior initiative) a disproportional, all-opposition Scrutiny Committee was lost with the LibDems and Independents voting against in the face of some heavy criticism from the administration leaders. They were apparently called a 'disgrace' and I have to agree. There is no reason at all to still be holding out over meeting-times. They are not going to win that argument and meanwhile they betray those Islanders who do not vote Conservative - over 50%.

Consequently the size of the existing committee was increased to 10 to allow the Tories to grant me one of their 5 places for the duration of this Council. Indeed they will actually be granting two places to Labour, to allow Deborah to join me on the committee, leaving them with 3 plus the three co-optees. Its not ideal and I would much prefer to see the LibDems and Independents take their one place entitlement to secure real opposition control.

Until then Deborah and I, on behalf of Island Labour, are providing the only real alternative to the Tories.

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

55,000 FOR THE FESTIVAL ?

Solent TV tonight is reporting that 55,000 tickets have been sold for the Rock Festival in June. That is 20,000 more than last year. And they haven't even got a licence yet.........

I support the Festival and usually attend, but 55,000 ? I suspect the IW Council will face a lot of flak about this. Appears a 'done deal' must exist BEFORE the licence is even granted. Poor sods in Fairlee ward.

PLANNING VICTORY

Went along to the Development Control Committee tonight to oppose a residential application in School Lane, Barton, on behalf of six local residents. All concerned about overcrowding and parking problems. Much to my delight the Committee listened to my submission - and that of a local resident - and refused the application, despite it being recommended for planning permission by the planning officers. The vote was 10 to 1 in favour of refusal. Tremendous !

Monday, March 13, 2006

THE CONTINUING SAGA OF SCRUTINY

After the abortive attempt last month to get the Scrutiny Committee resurrected as a disproportional, all-opposition-controlled body, with me as Chair, and the lack of any known, positive initiative on this issue since then from the LibDem and Independent groups, Deborah and I have decided we have had enough of messing around and will accept a Conservative offer of one of their places on the existing committee for the duration of this Council.

Additionally we have agreed that Deborah will nominate me to Wednesday's Full Council as Chair of the existing committee and the Conservatives will support. We would have preferred to have some acquiescence with this from the other groups, but that is clearly not going to happen.

However, there will first be another attempt to convert the Scrutiny Committee to disproportional lines - in line with last month plans - and we hope that the other groups will support this and then engage fully with the new Committee. If not, I will still hope that they will take their existing places on the currently proportional committee.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

AND THE COVERT PRIVATISATIONS.....

Not content with the rushed privatisation of Education Management last December, we learnt from the media today that 'Wightcare' is to be privatised without any veneer of recourse to democratic process. I heard about this last Friday from my contacts and have waited, naively, for some sort of proper decision-making process. But no ! Nothing !

So scores of low-paid, mainly female staff will be pushed out into the even lower-paying private sector - no doubt with zero-hours contracts to come in the future. And of course the service to vulnerable service-users will not be the same. A little bit of research will point to the failures of such privatisations - both for customers and transferred staff.

The irony of who the Cabinet Member for this area of service is has not been lost on me. Someone who always used to be deeply committed to keeping care workers in the public-sector as only they looked after vulnerable people properly.

As a member of the Policy Commission for 'Care', Health Scrutiny and Housing, I am particularly peeved that I have to learn about this from the media. Comments will be made....

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

AND SO THE JOB LOSSES BEGIN......

Found out through my grapevine that there are to be 18 compulsory redundancies in the Adult Services Directorate. Not big chiefs, but people generally in relatively lowly jobs. They include the Welfare Rights team - which has saved the Council vast amounts of money over the last 7 or 8 years by ensuring service users get their full social security benefit entitlement - and Team Clerks, who do the admin. for trained social workers.

So now we know where the 'efficiencies' are coming from. How dishonest the Council's budget was, as we always suspected. Much of this is not about backroom jobs, but jobs that save the Council money or support professionals in the field. Just like staff employed to support Cabinet members....

The expected cull has begun. And only last week in the media the Tories were still denying significant job losses as a result of their budget. Well 18 may not be significant to the Tories, but it is significant to those people, their families and their friends - and the Welfare Rights service will be a loss to the Council's revenues.

Monday, March 06, 2006

"COME FRIENDLY BOMBS AND RAIN ON" COUNTY HALL


In my 17 years living on the Island, mainly in Newport, the most abominably hideous building until recently has always been the County Hall complex. Now of course it is surpassed by the Multiplex complex that unfortunately is in my ward. Talk about dumping on Pan by previous Councils ! I always feel sorry for residents of Ash Road who used to look over the town and to the west, but now look at an enormous 'Staples' sign. That's how Liberals treat you if you stop voting for them.......as Pan people did many 15 years ago.

So it was with immense pleasure that I discovered a Tory policy last October, through the pages of the CP, that I wholeheartedly support - the sale and development of the County Hall site. I have never understood why we need a Council building in the middle of our main town that houses so many functions that don't deal with the public face to face. So I have no problem with relocating County Hall outside of Newport, provided that there is still something like the Customer Service Centre within the town and that the public can attend Council meetings in somewhere like Newport Guildhall. Apart from anything else it will take traffic out of central Newport.

The Tory plans to achieve this site sale and relocation are moving apace, and I am a party to at least some of the plan. As a party to these plans I am anxious that staff and the Island public are kept well-informed about what is going on on a regular basis, and I am assured this will be done by others who are more central to the plans and whose word I accept. I am also enthusiatic about potential plans to see more flexible working arrangements than the traditional attend at your desk for 40 hours per week. Such working has the potential to vastly improve the working lives of many people - provided, of course, that they still have jobs after the efficiency savings work though.

What will replace County Hall is naturally of some import. The last thing we want is another architectural abomination - we need something that enhances Newport and makes it an attractive town to visit.

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

LABOUR'S CONSIDERED RESPONSE TO COUNCIL BUDGET

Press Release:

After having a week to consider it in more detail, the IW Council Labour Group are still none the wiser over the detail of the Conservative Council's tax budget delivered to Full Council last week.

The Labour Group recognises that many of the re-direction of priorities are very welcome and things that Labour in power would try to do itself, in particular:

* The £2m net extra spending for adult social services;
* The £500k for addressing homelessness and the funding of an Empty Properties Officer;
* The £50k for cross-Solent patient travel;
* The £22k for additional CCTV monitoring resources;
* The £169k to match fund 40 Police Community Support Officers - a Labour Government community policy;
* The £140k for new library books;
* The 50p travel charge for under 19s.

These are the sort of things that lead to the Labour Group deciding last week not to oppose the Tory budget with its own alternative, but instead to abstain whilst holding a watching brief on how this budget is delivered.

However, there were some other good announcements made last week which are purely down to Labour Government funding:

* The claimed £5 million for schools merely matches what the Labour Government expects and demands the Council to pass on to our schools, though the 'Direct Schools Grant' element of the Government's revenue support settlement;

* Much of the free bus travel for pensioners is funded by an extra grant from the Labour Government.

Labour is amused that the Conservatives feel they need to claim the credit for these Government requirements.

Nonetheless, it is how the Budget will be funded that is causing Labour Councillors most concern, especially as they are no further forward in getting more detailed information, despite their efforts to do so.

The Conservatives last week claimed they would fund much of their spending on new priorities through £6.6 million of 'efficiency savings', claiming there is 'waste, duplication and bureaucracy' throughout parts of the Council. Labour would not doubt that there will be elements of this, but considers it is stretching credibility to claim there is £6.6m worth. Especially when £2.4 million of this is apparently located in the Adult Services Directorate; a department where much vital public service is undertaken.

Labour is also concerned that savings of £557k are to me made in what is called enigmatically 'Other Education', and a further £1.7 million in 'central and corporate services'.

Labour's greatest fear is that these 'efficiency savings' will ultimately mean significant job losses, though this is not admitted by the Conservatives. As the largest employer on the Island, Labour believes the Council has a responsibility not to throw its staff into unemployment, with the consequent effect on their families and the Island economy. Labour believes that Island jobs are just as important as populist policies.

The two Labour councillors, Deborah Gardiner & Geoff Lumley, are committed to their early pledge of last week - to watch the unfolding of this budget like hawks, and take appropriate steps if their fears prove true.

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

BUSY, BUSY CABINET

Went along to the Cabinet tonight, which must have been the busiest of this administration. A two and a half hour meeting that dealt with:

1. Council performance data - we learnt that the Council is looking into the possibility of a 'roof tax' for the 10,000 new house builds over the next 20 years (could raise £200m or £10m per year for infrastructure and such like - sounds good, no imperative, to me); I was assured that the Council hasn't further tightened the already stringent rules for homeless acceptances, despite a recent sharp drop.

2. An IW Fairtrade Strategy was agreed, thanks to Labour's original initiative last June.

3. Our public conveniences are going to be rationalised and made more attractive!

4. The Council is setting up an Improvement Board chaired by the Chief Exec of Northants. I secured a commitment to transparency with the publication of action points from its meetings.

5. The Education privatisation was confirmed and extended for the next year, with a guarantee made that there will be an 'exit strategy' if it does not work out as planned. I secured promises of resources into schools for pupil data analysis - vital to an standards improvement agenda.

6. A policy commission paper on public drinking was approved. I welcomed this, but stressed that the sellers of booze to underage people need to be clamped down upon, as well as licensed premises that encourage irresponsible drinking. I also stressed that young people should not be demonised, as it is a small minority that cause problems in town centres, etc.

7. A policy commission paper on decriminalising parking was approved. I welcome this too now that it will be implemented as an in-house operation .

8. A much needed new Special Educational Needs Strategy was approved. I secured a Member's briefing on this, given the implications for local councillors.

This was a meeting which saw the Tories delivering on chunks of their agenda, whether you agree with it or not. Very focussed and disciplined, but with room for an opposition member to make contributions. Once again only Labour was represented at the meeting - through me.

There was much suggestion from the Council Leader during the meeting that I am the opposition member that is most interested, able and strong enough to be the chair of a re-invigorated Scrutiny Committee - but as my readers will know by now this will not happen as long as the other opposition group members - LibDems and Independents - rest on their self-importance rather than seriously challenging this Tory administration

FURRLONGS PROTECTED FROM BUS PLANS

A renewed attempt to keep plans for a bus-gate at the junction of Furrlongs and St Georges Way in the Local Transport Plan (LTP) have been successfully seen off after my swift action. Such a gate could have seen main bus routes routed through Pan to avoid Coppins Bridge, and attracted much local opposition and my own last September. I subsequently secured assurances that this would not happen in the final LTP, but the plans were still there when the Plan was approved for submission to Full Council yesterday.

I immediately sought a 'call in' of this decision by the members of the existing Scrutiny Committee. One of the Tory members took an interest and through his good offices the Cabinet member has this evening instructed officers to remove these plans from the LTP.

I am delighted and know local residents will be too.

Friday, February 24, 2006

WHAT WAS THE POINT OF ALL OF THAT ?

Went along to the existing Tory-controlled Scrutiny Committee last night - I've not missed one yet. Found it even more under their control than usual with FOUR Tories at the table, plus the three co-opted people; so there wasn't even a pretence at them not controlling the scrutiny function. It was just like the LibDem/Island First days - an administration scrutinising themselves. Who polices the police ? The Council's performance assessors will love it ! Can hardly wait until May......

For the second meeting running there was no County Press presence - showing how irrelevant this committee is in their eyes. And for the third meeting in succession in its current guise (and there only have been three), there was no LibDem or Independent observer at the meeting. I find this astonishing. I accept that the committee is not what it should be, but surely a serious and responsible political group would keep a watching brief, as Labour does ? I increasingly get the feeling that self-importance is of more concern to some of the other opposition members than seriously challenging this Tory administration.

This committee no longer has a Chair after Garry Price's resignation last month, and the 'over our dead bodies' response of the LibDems and Independents to the idea of me being Chair of a reformed, truly opposition-controlled Scrutiny Committee. Consequently we had the alarming sight of one of the co-opted people being elected Chair for the evening. Nothing personal in my objection to this, but exactly who is she accountable to ? She was not elected - rather she was appointed by the Tories.

Indeed the format of these meetings smacks of a bureaucracy rather than a democracy. Unlike the Cabinet, Full Council, and now the Commissions, there is no facility or even ad hoc invitation for either members of the public who may go along or observing Councillors - like myself - to ask questions about what is going on.

What is going on, as Marvin Gaye famously asked, indeed ? (Musical references apparently now being all the rage at County Hall). This meeting was establishing a number of lines of enquiry for the next few months, all bar one of which were planning applications related. Forgive me if you think these are the key areas for scrutiny of this Council, but I would suggest that more enquiries on subjects like the other one they agreed last night - future affordable housing provision - are far more relevant to ordinary Islanders. But this is what you get when 3 of the Tory members on the committee are also members of the Development Control Committee.

I had to leave after that, but as my 18 year old son, who I made accompany me for the hour or so I was there, said 'What was the point of all of that?'.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

WHY I WON'T BE THE NEXT CHAIR OF SCRUTINY

Some of my readers are aware that I was going to be nominated to Full Council as the next Chair of a properly opposition-controlled Scrutiny Committee last night. However, it did not happen and I have now withdrawn from future consideration.

Labour were asked by the administration three weeks ago to consider making a nomination that they would then support. Deborah Gardiner and I agreed it should be me, as the one opposition councillor who is able to and does attend as many meetings as possible to hold to account this Council leadership.

Before I would let my name go forward I had two stipulations. One that the new committee should be as inclusive of opposition members as possible, and two that there would not be significant opposition from the other opposition groups. I achieved the first with agreement from the administration that all but two opposition members of the 12 in total would be able to be on the committee, together with 4 Tories and the 3 lay members.

However, before last night's Full Council it became clear that there was enough opposition from the LibDems and Independents to my being Chair to imperil the plan. So it was decided to defer this discussuion until next month.

Today Deborah and I accepted that the LibDems and Indpendents will never agree with a Labour councillor being Chair the Scrutiny Committee, so I have withdrawn. Hopefully we will still get the opposition-controlled committee I have suggested next month, but it will have to be a different Chair.

It remains to be seen who that will be and whether they will give the commitment and insight into the role of scrutiny that the position requires. On their record over the last seven months, I am not optimistic, but Deborah and I will go along with just about anyone who is put forward - with one or two exceptions - in the interests of having effective and robust formal scrutiny of this Tory administration. We do this in the interests of Islanders, not our personal egos.

A VERY UNSETTLING BUDGET

Last night saw the Tories approve a 2.49% increase in the Council Tax at Full Council. Assurances were given that services will not be slashed, but that £6.5m will be cut from existing service budgets by 'efficiencies' and a further £0.5m raised through higher charges. What these efficiencies are has not been revealed other than their intention to move resources from the back office to the frontline. Our real fear is that this will mean support jobs, but that is not admitted. We will watch this closely.

The Council meeting was like a political rally with the Tories banging the table in joy as each announcement was made by the Council Leader. There were lots of popular funding announcements - such as mainland travel costs for cancer patients, 50p travel for young people, unlimited free travel for pensioners, police community support officers - that Deborah and I as Labour councillors were pleased with. The Liberals along side us looked very uncomfortable as the Council Leader hammered their past record of non-delivery

Given the lack of transparency in the budget Deborah and I decided that it would be very difficult and churlish for us to propose our alternative budget as so much was unclear in what was being proposed by the Tories and we only had 20 minutes to consider the official papers. You cannot restore 'efficiencies', without knowing what they are. What a mad way to have to operate ! We said that we would abstain on their proposals and scrutinise their delivery over the next 12 months. The other opposition groups similarly abstained, though they had not prepared any alternative proposals.

Frankly I am deeply worried for the next 12 months.

On other business, plans to get the Scrutiny Committee back on track were deferred until next month, due to the importance of the budget debate and the unwillingness of one or two opposition members to engage as Labour wants to.

Sunday, February 19, 2006

A MASSIVE WEEK

This week will see the Conservative's establish their service-slashing budget for the next year, and set the financial tone for the next four years. Wednesday evening at 6pm will see the Annual Budget Council where they will reveal how they plan to cut £9m from the Council's budget. There is great secrecy about their budget, despite my request to get it into the open ahead of the meeting. Many people are worried who are dependent on local services. Very worryingly their restricted consultations on the budget seem to have supported their service-slashing agenda - as highlighted by a young man in this week's CP letters page.

Deborah and I will propose a budget alternative that will attempt to lessen the effect of their proposals and offer a clear choice between their political dogma and the real needs of the Island. Of course it will be sunk without trace..........

The Council meeting will also see attempts to re-surrect opposition control of the Scrutiny function. That is in the hands of the other opposition groups and hopefully they will join with Labour in formalising the holding the administration to account.

Friday, February 17, 2006

NO MORE 'PAN ESTATE' !

Motorists on St George's Way may notice that the 'Pan Estate' signpost has gone from just before the turn into Furrlongs. This is down to my initiative and after many local requests. No other housing estate has such a sign, so why did Pan ? Pan is Pan - no more, no less.

PAN MATTERS

Meeting of Pan Partnership management board last night.

Most notable decisions were to spend £18k on mobile CCTV, which is something I have been pursuing for some time as part of our 'safer communities' agenda. The cameras purchased will be able to be located at a variety of 'hotspots' within the ward, most notably by Barton Primary.

Additionally agreed to spend £17k on a community minibus, to be maintained by the schools within the ward. These decisions mean that the current budget will have been spent by end of financial year, which I am delighted about.

A Delivery Plan for the next financial year was also agreed, which the regional government office (GOSE) are happy with - they monitor us.

Finally I proposed and it was agreed that the vicar of St Paul's church - on Staplers Rd - should be appointed to the board. Just to show that my atheism is personal - as should be all religion.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

HEALTH INTEGRATION - THE STORY UNFOLDS

I went along to the Policy Commission I am on tonight - the one for Care, Health Scrutiny & Housing - to be greeted by a veritable phalanx of Health managers and Trust members from both the Island and the Strategic Health Authority. The main issue on the agenda for me was an update on the proposed IW health and social care integration.

There is still a commitment to achieve this from both the Council leadership and the IW Health Trusts, but the Leader of the Council was at pains to stress that it can only be achieved if the Trusts sort their finances out. Given that there seems to be as much chance of that as me thinking Alan Shearer is not a dirty footballer, this is clearly the 'dead duck' a Conservative councillor has recently deemed it. A shame really because it is the right way forward - but not at any cost to Council Tax payers

We were told last August that the IW Trusts would be in financial blanace by this March. It now seems to be next March. What odds on 'March 2008' this time next year?

Significantly the Chair of the Strategic Health Authority - a very important personage - stressed my own repeated point. The NHS is in receipt of record Government funding, but how that is spent and managed in local Trusts needs to improve.....

Sunday, February 12, 2006

EDUCATION, 'OLD NEWPORT' & SCRUTINY.....

Latter part of last week was spent fulfilling my various school governor roles. Full governor meeting at Medina HS, meetings at Downside MS- and a farewell party for the Downside Headteacher on Thursday. She had been there for 14 years and was an integral and well-respected part of the Pan community. I worked well with her for nearly 8 years as governor and Chair. She will be missed by very many, but after her retirement now is the time for a new Head, a new chapter.....will be interesting times.

Spent time at the Riverside Centre on Wednesday. I am now a Director there and spent a very informative couple of hours with the manager. Lots to read up !

Yesterday there was a fantastic 'Old Newport' all-day photo exhibition at Downside, put on by PNP and local businessman Barry Price. It was packed and very successful. It was great to see so many people there from all over the Island. Well done to all involved.

Finally, I have been involved in some discussions with the ruling administration about how to re-surrect a truly opposition-controlled Scrutiny Committee after the resignation of Garry Price as Chair last month. Deborah and I have wanted to get re-involved for some months now after the July walkouts, but without all parties agreeing to some constitutional changes this has not been possible. However, hopefully progress will be made on this at the next Full Council and all opposition councillors can start to formally hold this administration to account. Scrutiny is important to Islanders in the face of such a powerful Conservative adminstration.

Monday, February 06, 2006

GETTING ON WITH IT

Been very busy, which will explain no updates for nearly a week.

Wednesday spent thinking about and working on the alternative budget Labour will present on 22nd.

Thursday went along to the Safer Communities Policy Commission. At this the decision was made to de-criminalise car parking offences. I stressed the need to keep this service in-house to protect a revenue source for the Council, which the Council Leader assured me was what the administration will do. Also a paper considered about public drinking, which will provide legal remedies for the sorts of problems we have seen around Newport - including Pan recreation ground - since the Church Litten ban.

Today I went along to a Strategic Asset Management group meeting at the invitation of the Tory Chair. They want me to be involved as an opposition member. I found it interesting and potentially powerful, but I am wary of doing too much. I will decide after another meetinmg or so.

Later I was at the launch of the Newport Town Council petition. I am committed to this due to the unfairness of double taxation on existing parished areas, the potential for more local decision-making about our town, and my belief that there should never be taxation without representation. I suspect there will be elements of opposition, but all the parties are behind this.

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

LITTLE VICTORY

Cabinet last night at which I somehow managed to get them to amend their own consultation response to SEEDA's Regional Economic Strategy. I said that I was unhappy at the lack of emphasis on having a higher earnings economy on the IW and they agreed, and will amend their response ! Worth going along.
NB. SEEDA = South East Economic Development Agency.

There was also the Audit Commission's report on their 'improving adequately' 2-star status for 2004/5 - up to Oct o5. I drew attention to a number of cautionary statements in the report about staff morale, changes at the 'top', lack of capacity, and the proposed health integration.

The cabinet also approved the next consultative document for the Island Plan.

This morning, with the latest rumours about the parlous state of the Health Trusts' finances (borrowing money just to limit their overspend, which last autumn they pledged they would not have), the health integration was pronounced to be a 'dead duck' by a Tory member. Indeed ! Exactly what Labour has been saying for months. I will watch with interest how they will try to wriggle out of this one.

Sunday, January 29, 2006

PAN PROGRESS AND OTHER MATTERS

Went along to a Pan Development steering group on Friday. This consists of various officers and 3 Tory Cabinet members, plus me, which will make recommendations to Cabinet. I have been attending these for 4 months now to keep an eye on what is being planned - which hasn't been very much until now.

Friday was much better with my securing a commitment for the group to start communicating with Pan residents about where things stand and where things are going. A 'relief road' as part of the development is something that many residents want, but this is now included in a Council traffic management review of the whole of Newport. The development will have 30% affordable housing, which the group agreed to recommend should be for Islanders only. A list of infrastructure items that are required will be compiled, which should include a community and health centre, both of which are much needed. Finally it is clear that not a sod will be turned on the site until April 2009 - 3 years away.

Thursday I attended a briefing on the feasibility study produced by PA Consulting on the potential Strategic Partnering (privatisation) of many Council services. The more services the better it seems. Surprise, surprise it is 'feasible' and now a 'business case' will be produced by late March. The clear assumption being made is that private = good; public = bad. I took the opportunity to briefly address staff with an outline of my own scepticism and support for public services.

Also on Thursday I attended a Newport Town Council working party with other Newport councillors and the Council Leader. Given that the Council will be precepting unparished areas from April I feel we have no choice but to have a Town Council to make sure that the money is spent in Newport's interests. As Pan is an integral part of Newport I want to see it as part of the Town Council area, as Pan on its own does not make sense and I know there is very little support for such a breakaway. Petitions to secure the necessary 2000 signatures across the whole of Newport and Carisbrooke will be going out in the relatively near future. For 2006/7 there will be a Newport Town management committee, consisting of Newport IW councillors, that will oversee the precept until the Town Council is created - probably for 2007/8.

One things I like from all of this is that the Guildhall could be brought back into political and democratic use as a joint base for a Town Council and meetings of the IW Council (should the latter pursue its intent to flatten County Hall). The last democratic body to use the Guildhall was the old Newport Borough Council, abolished in 1974 and a Labour council !

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

ADDRESSING OUR LOW WAGE ECONOMY


With our low wage economy isn't it good to see the Council making efforts to improve that situation ? £150k for a new Chief Executive will certainly help that somewhat. But then it will go down again when they privatise 90% of their own staff - as is floated by the consultants they are using to look into 'strategic partnering'.

I remember the LibDems bringing in their own 'mover and shaker' as Chief Exec about 7 years ago. He was paid that sort of money - and even more when they realised that moving and shaking weren't really his forte. He organised so little movement that the Island's general election count in 2001 was reported at the same time as the Ulster constituencies.

TWO STAR HELP FOR A TWO STAR COUNCIL

Members were advised today that the Council is to get advice and support from the Chief Exec of Tory Northants County Council, which the Leader lauded as an example of help from the local government family. I checked out this council on the Audit Commission site and found that like the IW it is a two-star authority, judged to be improving 'well' rather than the IW's 'adequately'. A cursory glance at other authorities they could have approached turned up quite a few four star authorities in the south of England. Why not approach them for help rather than Northants ?

Monday, January 23, 2006

MEANWHILE IN A PARALLEL UNIVERSE

This was in something I received tonight from within the higher echelons of the Council:

"One of the most rewarding commitments I had last week was to work with the members of the Scrutiny Committee on putting together a work programme. Scrutiny has been a bit stop start over the last few months, for a variety of reasons, but I see a group of dedicated and enthusiastic members who will embrace the task of focusing their efforts on enquiries which can make a real difference to service users and to communities."

Anyone familiar with the doings and non-doings of this Scrutiny Committee over the last 6 months will surely burst into laughter. I can hardly wait to see this real difference !

COMPLICATED LIFE

When I am not being a Councillor I have to earn a proper living to supplement my £6k per annum allowance, which I do by working for the Dept for Work & Pensions in Newport. As you would expect from a traditional Labour councillor, in my work life I am also a trade union activist, representing members with their day to day work problems. My union is PCS and this Thursday and Friday I will be joining my colleagues in the DWP across the nation in a 2 days strike. As if my life wasn't complicated enough ! So at 7am each day I will be out on the picket line.

PCS members are on strike against job losses (the government wants a further 15,000 civil service job losses by 2008 in the DWP alone), crackdowns on our conditions of service, worsening services to the public, rubbish IT systems (provided by the private sector), more use of call centres, etc etc. This sort of agenda will seem awfully familiar to Islanders working in other public sector areas.

Its just a pity that workers sometimes have no option but to use the only weapon they have in the face of no longer bearable attacks on their lives............

Saturday, January 21, 2006

HYPOCRITES

As the Tory Council seeks a new Chief Executive, they have set up a 'microsite' website for potential candidates - see http://www.unleashthetalent.co.uk/

Within that site it states - "the Island has a history as a forcing ground for talent. That history has continued over the last few years, with colleagues in a range of senior positions having moved on to new, more senior, roles elsewhere (including a Chief Executive, two Directors of Children's Services and (get this) a Government Office Education advisor role). Yes, the very same recent Director of Children's Services who was was unceremoniously dumped in December is now being lauded as a paragon as they attempt to con someone to come and do their dirty work.

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

PRICE RESIGNS FROM SCRUTINY CHAIR

Full Council tonight, where we learnt that Cllr Gary Price (not present again) has resigned from the Chair of the so-called Scrutiny Committee after 5 months of ineffectiveness and invisibility. He cited lack of support from his own LibDem group, from his local party, and from the other political groups. He probably meant the sheer isolation he suffered as Chair! Must have been like listening to the entire Joy Division back catalogue in one sitting. There may next month be another attempt by the Tories to return the committee to opposition control - but don't hold your breath..... . Additionally they were expressing unhappiness at the new Town & Parish Council rep on Scrutiny being politically affilated - he is the local LibDem agent.

The opposition motion expressing concern at the Children's Services privatisation predictably went down with Labour, LibDems and Indys all voting in favour. I tried to be sweet and reasonable in moving the motion, but the public gallery easily spotted the whipped Tory vote. The Tories own motion approving the Cabinet privatisation decision went through with only Labour & LibDems against.

On the budget I welcomed the £1.7m better funding from Government, which is now being used to settle £1.7m debts to the local NHS Trusts - and they still want to integrate with the Trusts!!!!

I asked Cllr Wood when we would have details - the 'full horror' - of their cuts or 'efficiencies' for next year's £9m-less budget and was assured there will be details published ahead of the February Budget Council. In response to a jibe from Cllr Mazillius, I assured him there will be a Labour budget proposal this year that seeks to ameliorate some of the Tory-proposed worst 'efficiencies'.

On a personal note I had many condolences from members of all parties and none, which were appreciated

SERVICE RESUMED

Well I am back on the Island and ready for the fray. Thanks to all those who sent me messages of condolence over the last 10 days.

Full Council tonight and my report will follow tomorrow.

Monday, January 09, 2006

BEREAVEMENT

My father died early Monday morning, so I won't be posting much this week