Two little stories to ponder:
1. A contentious issue has two prime protagonists, and a third party that sits almost silent on the sidelines. Is it then balanced to re-visit the issue with the silent one and just one of the main protagonists ?
2. Three people. Two are asked to do a difficult job, but fail and resign quickly. A third takes on the job and succeeds. The job is then made even more difficult; indeed un-do-able. Who commands respect - the first two, the third, or the people who change the goalposts ?
Answers gratefully received....
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment